Re: [math-fun] A use for Jud's method
At 05:59 PM 9/28/2003, John Conway wrote:
I'm sure the program would also find a few unforeseen things that would amply justify the trouble of writing it. How about it, Jud?
I think I will try it, if I can appeal to this group for some help on geometric details if I need to. I never claimed that the method would work, I just thought it might. But we can see how far it can go. I plan three phases: 1. 3D, unit spheres if that works, then: 2. 3D, general radius and then maybe: 3. 4D case. I think it will be easier to work with the equivalent spherical caps instead of spheres. Figure on giving me about a month, I have plans for next Saturday and all of the next two weekends after that. (And I've been half sick since last Tuesday. My wife asked "which half?". I said the top half.)
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Jud McCranie wrote:
I think I will try it, if I can appeal to this group for some help ...
I think it will be easier to work with the equivalent spherical caps instead of spheres.
There doesn't seem to be any difference to me. Think of them as unit vectors, whose inner products may not exceed such-&-such.
I've been half sick since last Tuesday. My wife asked "which half?". I said the top half.)
Your wife sounds a bit like mine. JHC
participants (2)
-
John Conway -
Jud McCranie