Re: [math-fun] Just another brick in the wall
27 Dec
2014
27 Dec
'14
7:56 a.m.
In many ancient brick structures, the mortar is stronger than the brick -- at least at the time of collapse. The mortar retains its shape, and the bricks have collapsed & turned to dust. At 11:57 PM 12/26/2014, Bill Gosper wrote:
Who needs mortar? gosper.org/martinsmarbles.png --rwg
wds>
QUESTION: Using L:1 rectangular bricks, does there exist any pattern such that the crack length amplification factor always is >=C, for some C>sqrt(2), no matter what direction? What is the greatest achievable C?
If nonconvex tesselators are allowed, then Gosper's fractal "snowflake" shaped "bricks" would assure crack-length amplification factor of INFINITY... but only in the limit where the mortar thickness tends to 0.
3982
Age (days ago)
3982
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Henry Baker