Antwort: Re: [math-fun] Most influential mathematician?
Hello, this is maybe such a project: http://www.qedeq.org/index.html Greetings, Dirk Lattermann "David Wilson" <davidwwilson@comcast.net>@mailman.xmission.com am 03.03.2006 15:28:48 Bitte antworten an math-fun <math-fun@mailman.xmission.com> Gesendet von: math-fun-bounces+dirk.lattermann=bgs-ag.de@mailman.xmission.com An: "math-fun" <math-fun@mailman.xmission.com> Kopie: Thema: Re: [math-fun] Most influential mathematician? What is needed is not an influential voice so much as an ambitious doer, someone who will start the project instead of talking about it. As Goethe said: What you can do, or dream you can do, begin it! Boldness has genius, power and magic in it. If someone started such a project, those influential people with opinions on the way it should be carride out would soon be on the bandwagon, and probably take over the project. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Gray" <stevebg@adelphia.net> To: "math-fun" <math-fun@mailman.xmission.com> Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 9:10 PM Subject: Re: [math-fun] Most influential mathematician?
I published a proof in the 3/2003 Monthly that I was then not sure was correct and, after thinking about it for hours, I'm still not sure! It doesn't look like other proofs, involving a trick that seems a little too arbitrary, and I don't know quite how to think about it. Maybe the computer could tell me. :o
Steve Gray
----- Original Message ----- From: "Henry Baker" <hbaker1@pipeline.com> To: "Gareth McCaughan" <gareth.mccaughan@pobox.com> Cc: <dasimov@earthlink.net>; <math-fun@mailman.xmission.com> Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 5:02 PM Subject: Re: [math-fun] Most influential mathematician?
Computer proof-checking technology (HW & SW) have gotten to the point where it now makes sense to develop a system whereby _every_ mathematical proof could eventually be _checked_ by computer. This won't happen overnight, but will require a 10-20 year effort to develop a generic system into which one could shovel all the lemmas, theorems, etc., so that _every_ paper submitted to a math journal would come with its own certification that the proof is valid.
_______________________________________________ math-fun mailing list math-fun@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/math-fun
_______________________________________________ math-fun mailing list math-fun@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/math-fun
I did a quick glance at this web site. It looks to have many of the same goals as what I've described, but not much momentum. At 12:18 AM 3/6/2006, dirk.lattermann@bgs-ag.de wrote:
Hello,
this is maybe such a project:
http://www.qedeq.org/index.html
Greetings, Dirk Lattermann
participants (2)
-
dirk.lattermann@bgs-ag.de -
Henry Baker