Re: [math-fun] Biijection between the sets of even and odd subsets of an even-sized set
Very nice. And it's clear why that doesn't work for #(S) = odd. --Dan Andy wrote: << On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Dan Asimov <dasimov@earthlink.net> wrote:
Given a finite set S of size n, let E denote the set of its subsets with even size and let O denote the set of its subsets of odd size. Then it's easy to see that
#(E) = #(O).
(Expanding the LHS of (1-1)^n = 0 does the trick nicely.)
When n is itself odd, there is a simple natural bijection between E and O: just map any subset of S to its complement.
But when n is even, there doesn't seem to be anything nearly so natural.
There is no "natural" bijection, that is one that is invariant under a permutation of the elemnts of S. Proof: What does the bijection map the empty set to? An arbitrary choice is required here.
_____________________________________________________________________ "It don't mean a thing if it ain't got that certain je ne sais quoi." --Peter Schickele
participants (1)
-
Dan Asimov