[math-fun] Computer chess critic
Has anyone ever tried to teach a computer to critique chess games? To distinguish between amateurish, bland, impressive and truly great chess games? I feel like this might be easier than over-the-board analysis.
Yes; Fritz is a notable example.
From this position (over ten years ago)
http://www.plambeck.org/oldhtml/chess/fritzannotation.jpg It spit out "a beautiful, forced end to the game" after 27. Nd5 That's probably overstating it a bit, but I still appreciated the compliment. On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 10:10 AM, David Wilson <davidwwilson@comcast.net>wrote:
Has anyone ever tried to teach a computer to critique chess games?
To distinguish between amateurish, bland, impressive and truly great chess games?
I feel like this might be easier than over-the-board analysis.
_______________________________________________ math-fun mailing list math-fun@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/math-fun
-- Thane Plambeck tplambeck@gmail.com http://counterwave.com/
participants (2)
-
David Wilson -
Thane Plambeck