Re: [math-fun] The spatial universe is finite !!!???
Megachiropteran cinematographer: marchantiaceous centauromachias. Bedroom boredom? Brighten berthing! << Oh! -- but which direction you get rotated in invariant! That is, the Poincare Dodecahedron is not its own mirror image. So such a universe would have a large-scale handedness. Wouldn't that be neat...
I have the impression that the Poincaré dodecahedral manifold D created by a 1/10 rotation identifying opposite faces, and the one using a -1/10 rotation, are isometric to each other -- much as a right- and a left-handed H opf fibration of the 3-sphere are isometric. What I'm wondering now is whether D double-covers a non-orientable manifold. * * * By the way, a cool thing about D is that it was the first counterexample to something Poincaré thought he had proved -- that any 3-manifold M with trivial (i.e., zero) first homology group H_1(M) must be homeomorphic to the 3-sphere. He discovered that the fundamental group pi_1(D), when abelianized (to obtain H_1(D)) becomes the zero group. So Poincaré, chastened, then suggested that *maybe* if the fundamental group of a 3manifold is trivial, *then* it must be homeomorphic to the 3-sphere. (He didn't actually couch this as a conjecture, but only as a possibility.) --Dan
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 asimovd@aol.com wrote:
I have the impression that the Poincaré dodecahedral manifold D created by a 1/10 rotation identifying opposite faces, and the one using a -1/10 rotation, are isometric to each other -- much as a right- and a left-handed H opf fibration of the 3-sphere are isometric.
Yes of course they're isometric, but only by an orientation-reversing isometry.
What I'm wondering now is whether D double-covers a non-orientable manifold.
I already answered this in the negative. The group is both metachiral and parachiral, the latter meaning that it is not the chiral part of an achiral group. John Conway
participants (2)
-
asimovd@aol.com -
John Conway