If you're on a Linux system, cat file.txt | tr 'A-Za-z' 'N-ZA-Mn-za-m' should do the trick, where the text you want to translate is in file.txt. At 04:47 AM 3/31/2016, Tom Rokicki wrote:
It's rot13. The name should tell you everything. Most good mail readers let you ungarble it with a single keystroke.
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 7:35 AM, Simon Plouffe <simon.plouffe@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello, what language is this : V jnf unccl jvgu guvf fbyhgvba, hagvy V abgvprq gung jura A vf guerr, guvf tvirf frira qvssrerag beqrevatf, naq gurer ner bayl fvk gbgny beqrevatf bs guerr guvatf! ????
Google translate cannot even recognize what it is,
Ok, I see, you have something big in your mouth and this is english, but unable to pronounce it correctly ??
Have a nice day.
Simon Plouffe
2016-03-31 13:17 GMT+02:00 Andy Latto <andy.latto@pobox.com>:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 11:35 PM, Keith F. Lynch <kfl@keithlynch.net> wrote:
But now I'm wondering about the more general case. For instance the number of sort orders of distances to N random points in a plane, as measured from any point in the plane. I think it would not be a constant.
Here's a fallacious proof I came up with for the wrong answer. I had fun figuring out the fallacy, so maybe some other funsters will too. There's a hint as to what's wrong in rot13 at the bottom; I'll post the fallacy, together with the correct answer, in a day or two.
For any two of the points, A, B, draw the perpendicular bisector of AB. If we measure from a point on one side of this bisector, A will come before B in the ordering, while if we measure from a point on the other side, B will come before A. So with N points, we have N(N-1)/2 bisectors dividing up the plane into regions, and we'll get a different ordering for each region. If we have K lines in the plane in general position, they divide the plane into K(K + 1)/2 + 1 regions; this is easily seen by induction; when we add the K'th line, it intersects the existing K-1 lines in K points, dividing it into K pieces (K-2 segments and 2 rays); each piece divides one planar region in 2, so we have added K regions, so K lines give us the 1 region we start with plus 1 + 2 + 3 + .... + K more.
So with N points, we have N(N-1)/2 perpendicular bisectors, so they divide the plane into
1 + (N(N-1)/2)((N(N-1)/2) + 1) / 2 = (N^4 - 2 N^3 + 3 N^2 - 2N + 8)/8 possible orderings.
V jnf unccl jvgu guvf fbyhgvba, hagvy V abgvprq gung jura A vf guerr, guvf tvirf frira qvssrerag beqrevatf, naq gurer ner bayl fvk gbgny beqrevatf bs guerr guvatf!
Andy -- http://cube20.org/ -- [ <http://golly.sf.net/>Golly link suppressed; ask me why] --
If you're on a Linux system, you have The One True Editor (emacs). M-X rot13-region On 03/31/2016 09:46 AM, Henry Baker wrote:
If you're on a Linux system,
cat file.txt | tr 'A-Za-z' 'N-ZA-Mn-za-m'
should do the trick, where the text you want to translate is in file.txt.
At 04:47 AM 3/31/2016, Tom Rokicki wrote:
It's rot13. The name should tell you everything. Most good mail readers let you ungarble it with a single keystroke.
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 7:35 AM, Simon Plouffe <simon.plouffe@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello, what language is this : V jnf unccl jvgu guvf fbyhgvba, hagvy V abgvprq gung jura A vf guerr, guvf tvirf frira qvssrerag beqrevatf, naq gurer ner bayl fvk gbgny beqrevatf bs guerr guvatf! ????
Hmmm... I must have an old version of XEmacs on Windoze; it doesn't have this macro. At 03:12 PM 3/31/2016, John Aspinall wrote:
If you're on a Linux system, you have The One True Editor (emacs). M-X rot13-region
On 03/31/2016 09:46 AM, Henry Baker wrote:
If you're on a Linux system,
cat file.txt | tr 'A-Za-z' 'N-ZA-Mn-za-m'
should do the trick, where the text you want to translate is in file.txt.
At 04:47 AM 3/31/2016, Tom Rokicki wrote:
It's rot13. The name should tell you everything. Most good mail readers let you ungarble it with a single keystroke.
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 7:35 AM, Simon Plouffe <simon.plouffe@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello, what language is this : V jnf unccl jvgu guvf fbyhgvba, hagvy V abgvprq gung jura A vf guerr, guvf tvirf frira qvssrerag beqrevatf, naq gurer ner bayl fvk gbgny beqrevatf bs guerr guvatf! ????
I'm apparently stuck with vi, having used it for so many years I just don't feel like learning another one. But my favorite editor of all was Brief (for PC's, in the early '90s), which I learned is called Crisp in a Unix version. It had its own macro language which was easy to learn and fun to write in. You could highlight and modify / move text in any screen rectangle, tile the screen with multiple panes (advanced for the '90s) and other stuff. (But I never learned emacs, so I can't compare the two, though somewhere I heard that Brief / Crisp shares many features with it.) Also, to be fair, vi has improved, at least for writing code, where it matches parentheses and colors different kinds of commands differently, etc. —Dan
On Apr 1, 2016, at 6:20 PM, William R Somsky <wrsomsky@gmail.com> wrote:
Sacrilege! The One True Editor is vi, you heathen! ;-)
On Mar 31, 2016 3:13 PM, "John Aspinall" <j@jkmfamily.org> wrote:
If you're on a Linux system, you have The One True Editor (emacs). M-X rot13-region
participants (4)
-
Dan Asimov -
Henry Baker -
John Aspinall -
William R Somsky