Re: [math-fun] ln(x^2+1) -- correction
[Actually, I made a slight typo in the previous e-mail. But this one is slicker since it doesn't require differentiation of log.] log(x^2 + 1) = log(x + i) + log(x - i), so it suffices to show that the (4n + 2)th derivatives of log(x + i) are all pure-imaginary when x = 1. Let x = 1 + y, so we are interested in the Taylor series of: log(y + (1 + i)) about the point y = 0. We want to show that the (4n + 2)th coefficients are all pure-imaginary. This follows from the claim that the coefficient in y^n of the series expansion of log(y + a) is [a real multiple of] a^-n, which is true by dimensional analysis. Sincerely, Adam P. Goucher
Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2015 at 3:24 PM From: "Erich Friedman" <erichfriedman68@gmail.com> To: math-fun <math-fun@mailman.xmission.com> Subject: [math-fun] ln(x^2+1)
this morning i found that for f(x)=ln(x^2+1), that the (4n+2)th derivatives all vanish at x=1. it took me an hour to figure out why, using geometric series, but surely there must be an easier way to see this. does anyone have an elegant proof of this?
erich _______________________________________________ math-fun mailing list math-fun@mailman.xmission.com https://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/math-fun
participants (1)
-
Adam P. Goucher