RE: [math-fun] Lie (circle) geometry
Fred writes: << Is anybody interested in the Laguerre group of equilong transformations --- nowadays apparently subsumed, along with the Moebius group, into something called Lie geometry? I've looked in books by Cecil and by Coolidge, and at numerous web sites, but I'm not much nearer understanding what a Laguerre involution --- let alone a general equilong transformation --- actually _looks_ like! I could say (much) more, but I'll refrain until I find out if there's any takers out there.
The Moebius group PSL(2,C) of conformal automorphism of S^2 is pretty darn fascinating, so whatever this is about sounds promising. Can you tell us at least a bit more about what these equilong thingies are (even if the def. is somewhat opaque)? --Dan
On 12/12/05, dasimov@earthlink.net <dasimov@earthlink.net> wrote:
The Moebius group PSL(2,C) of conformal automorphism of S^2 is pretty darn fascinating, so whatever this is about sounds promising.
Can you tell us at least a bit more about what these equilong thingies are (even if the def. is somewhat opaque)?
--Dan
Oh lor', I was rather hoping somebody was going to tell me ... As in Moebius geometry, the basic geometric objects in Laguerre geometry are "cycles", including in 2-D, circles, lines, points; or in 3-D, spheres, planes, points, etc. However, unlike Moebius, cycles are (in general) "oriented" --- think of interiors or exteriors of discs and half-planes, rather than circles and lines. [This sounds a rather trivial distinction at first, but patience ...] "Equilong" (ghastly word --- why not say "commensal"?) transformations preserve cycles, and distance: specifically, the length of that common tangent cone which joins a pair of spheres "compatibly", its interior touching an inside-oriented sphere, its exterior touching an outside- oriented sphere. The catch is that points_ are not preserved as such: only cycles. Neither are loci preserved, so that two cycles with the same locus but distinct orientations may transform to distinct loci. The fundamental generators of the group [corresponding to reflections in lines in 2-D or planes in 3-D for isometries] are "Laguerre" involutions, the definition of which is a tad unfriendly: given a base-line K in 2-D and scalar "power" p, LI(K,p) transforms an arbitrary (directed) line L into the line M concurrent with L and K, such that the half-angles u,v between L,M resp. and K satisfy tan(u/2)tan(v/2) = p. The special cases when L and K are parallel or anti-parallel require a limiting argument. [I can supply a Maple procedure which does the business in ordinary 2-D homogeneous line coordinates L1.x + L2.y = -L0: I mention this because it took a good deal of work to make reasonably clean and correct!]. A spectacular example of an equilong transformation takes a polygon and forms its offset by a given margin in both directions: it's an instructive exercise to express this transformation as a product of (the minimum number of) involutions! Some references: Besides numerous XIX-th century tomes in German, the only books in English I know of are T.~E.~Cecil \sl Lie Sphere Geometry \rm Springer (1992). J.~L.~Coolidge \sl A Treatise on the Circle and the Sphere \rm Clarendon Press (1916); Chelsea (1971). Papers that seem relevant, but only tweak the curtain slightly: Edward Kasner, John De Cicco \sl Equilong and Conformal Transformations of Period Two \rm Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (1940) 26(7): 471–476; online at http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1078212 B.~J.~Zlobec \& N.~M.~Kosta \sl Geometric Constructions on Cycles \rm Rocky Mt. J. Math. \bf 34 (2004) 1565--1585; along with at least two more very similar; also online. Two papers which I haven't managed to see yet, by J.~F.~Rigby and I.~M.~Yaglom in C.~Davis, B.~Gr\"unbaum, F.~A.~Scherk \sl The Geometric Vein, the Coxeter Festschrift \rm Springer (1981).
participants (2)
-
dasimov@earthlink.net -
Fred lunnon