[math-fun] Happy birthday Neil and the OEIS!
Here's my Guardian story today on the OEIS. Featuring funsters. The man who loved only integer sequences http://www.theguardian.com/science/alexs-adventures-in-numberland/2014/oct/0...
Merci Alex ! Je clique asap ! Best, É. Catapulté de mon aPhone
Le 7 oct. 2014 à 08:48, "Alex Bellos" <alexanderbellos@gmail.com> a écrit :
Here's my Guardian story today on the OEIS. Featuring funsters.
The man who loved only integer sequences
http://www.theguardian.com/science/alexs-adventures-in-numberland/2014/oct/0...
_______________________________________________ math-fun mailing list math-fun@mailman.xmission.com https://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/math-fun
I guess I don't have much of a sense of humor when headlines lie in an attempt to be cutesy. Neil Sloane has done many other things besides the OEIS, like become a world expert in lattices in Euclidean space. --Dan On Oct 6, 2014, at 11:47 PM, Alex Bellos <alexanderbellos@gmail.com> wrote:
Here's my Guardian story today on the OEIS. Featuring funsters.
The man who loved only integer sequences
http://www.theguardian.com/science/alexs-adventures-in-numberland/2014/oct/0...
Given arbitrary integers A, B, C they determine the quadratic form Q(x,y) = Ax^2 + Bxy + Cy^2 . * Does the limiting density dens(A,B,C) of the set of integers represented by Q always exist??? * If so, can one determine its value??? Here dens(A,B,C) is defined as follows: Define the set Q_R := {Q(x,y) | (x,y) \in Z^2 with x^2+y^2 <= R^2} . Note that any repeated value of Q(x,y) appears in Q_R with multiplicity = 1 here. Now let dens(A,B,C) := limit as R -> oo of (card(Q_R) / (pi R^2)), if it exists. (Here pi R^2 is a stand-in for the number of lattice points lying inside the disk of radius R about the origin. But the two expressions are asymptotic to each other, so this should not be a problem.) Problem: Given any integers A, B, C does the limit dens(A,B,C) exist? And if so, what is its value? -------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --Dan
The Cebotarev density theorem is relevant here, although it does not do exactly what you ask for - see Cox,. Primes of Form x^2+ny^2 (Wiley) On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 4:25 AM, Dan Asimov <dasimov@earthlink.net> wrote:
Given arbitrary integers A, B, C they determine the quadratic form
Q(x,y) = Ax^2 + Bxy + Cy^2 .
* Does the limiting density dens(A,B,C) of the set of integers represented by Q always exist???
* If so, can one determine its value???
Here dens(A,B,C) is defined as follows:
Define the set
Q_R := {Q(x,y) | (x,y) \in Z^2 with x^2+y^2 <= R^2} . Note that any repeated value of Q(x,y) appears in Q_R with multiplicity = 1 here.
Now let
dens(A,B,C) := limit as R -> oo of (card(Q_R) / (pi R^2)),
if it exists. (Here pi R^2 is a stand-in for the number of lattice points lying inside the disk of radius R about the origin. But the two expressions are asymptotic to each other, so this should not be a problem.)
Problem: Given any integers A, B, C does the limit dens(A,B,C) exist? And if so, what is its value? -------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--Dan _______________________________________________ math-fun mailing list math-fun@mailman.xmission.com https://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/math-fun
-- Dear Friends, I have now retired from AT&T. New coordinates: Neil J. A. Sloane, President, OEIS Foundation 11 South Adelaide Avenue, Highland Park, NJ 08904, USA. Also Visiting Scientist, Math. Dept., Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ. Phone: 732 828 6098; home page: http://NeilSloane.com Email: njasloane@gmail.com
Some data: 100% of integers are represented by the form XY. 33% of integers are represented by the form 3XY. 0% are represented by the forms X^2+Y^2 and X^2-2Y^2. The last line is a bit delicate: If we restrict gcd(X,Y)=1, the forms represent numbers with no 4K-1 divisor and no 8K+-3 divisor, which slowly -> 0% for large numbers. If I've done my estimation right, the addon for allowing gcd(X,Y)>1 doesn't change things. The fact that X^2+Y^2 represents only non-negatives, while X^2-2Y^2 represents both signs, should be mentioned. But 2*0% = 0%, so it doesn't matter. Rich ------ Quoting Neil Sloane <njasloane@gmail.com>:
The Cebotarev density theorem is relevant here, although it does not do exactly what you ask for - see Cox,. Primes of Form x^2+ny^2 (Wiley)
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 4:25 AM, Dan Asimov <dasimov@earthlink.net> wrote:
Given arbitrary integers A, B, C they determine the quadratic form
Q(x,y) = Ax^2 + Bxy + Cy^2 .
* Does the limiting density dens(A,B,C) of the set of integers represented by Q always exist???
* If so, can one determine its value???
Here dens(A,B,C) is defined as follows:
Define the set
Q_R := {Q(x,y) | (x,y) \in Z^2 with x^2+y^2 <= R^2} . Note that any repeated value of Q(x,y) appears in Q_R with multiplicity = 1 here.
Now let
dens(A,B,C) := limit as R -> oo of (card(Q_R) / (pi R^2)),
if it exists. (Here pi R^2 is a stand-in for the number of lattice points lying inside the disk of radius R about the origin. But the two expressions are asymptotic to each other, so this should not be a problem.)
Problem: Given any integers A, B, C does the limit dens(A,B,C) exist? And if so, what is its value? -------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--Dan _______________________________________________ math-fun mailing list math-fun@mailman.xmission.com https://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/math-fun
-- Dear Friends, I have now retired from AT&T. New coordinates:
Neil J. A. Sloane, President, OEIS Foundation 11 South Adelaide Avenue, Highland Park, NJ 08904, USA. Also Visiting Scientist, Math. Dept., Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ. Phone: 732 828 6098; home page: http://NeilSloane.com Email: njasloane@gmail.com _______________________________________________ math-fun mailing list math-fun@mailman.xmission.com https://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/math-fun
Are any of you involved in running the DIMACS meeting and associated events, or involved in running OEIS or seqfans? I won't be able to attend the meeting, but the Handbook and the website have played a huge role in my career over the last 40 years, and if there's an opportunity for me to express my gratitude to Neil, perhaps in the form of a toast to be delivered in absentia at the conference dinner, or a short article in a festschrift, or anything like that, I'd really like to know! (I've wrote to Eugene Fiorini at DIMACS last Friday and the Friday before that, but have received no reply.) Jim Propp
Yes, well deserved Happy Birthday. which makes me think of a sequence for the occasion 1, 75, 900, 3900, 27393, 250000, 657450, 39447000, 2366000000, ... Any clue ? 1 Neil James Alexander Sloane 75 years, 900 months, 3900 weeks, 27394 days, 250000 sequences, 657450 hours, 39447000 minutes, 2366000000 seconds, approximately on October 10 2014. Happy Birhday Neil, Simon 2014-10-07 12:45 GMT+02:00 James Propp <jamespropp@gmail.com>:
Are any of you involved in running the DIMACS meeting and associated events, or involved in running OEIS or seqfans?
I won't be able to attend the meeting, but the Handbook and the website have played a huge role in my career over the last 40 years, and if there's an opportunity for me to express my gratitude to Neil, perhaps in the form of a toast to be delivered in absentia at the conference dinner, or a short article in a festschrift, or anything like that, I'd really like to know!
(I've wrote to Eugene Fiorini at DIMACS last Friday and the Friday before that, but have received no reply.)
Jim Propp _______________________________________________ math-fun mailing list math-fun@mailman.xmission.com https://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/math-fun
participants (7)
-
Alex Bellos -
Dan Asimov -
Eric Angelini -
James Propp -
Neil Sloane -
rcs@xmission.com -
Simon Plouffe