[math-fun] Fw: Re: Reentrant polygons with area zero
(Oops, this was meant to go to the mailing list!)
Sent: Sunday, July 31, 2016 at 4:40 PM From: apgoucher@gmx.com To: "James Propp" <jamespropp@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [math-fun] Reentrant polygons with area zero
Consider the space V of rational linear combinations of pth roots of unity. This space has dimension p - 1, since the degree of the minimal poly of omega is p - 1.
It's also the direct sum of the spaces Re(V) and Im(V). Each of these has dimension at most (p - 1)/2, and equality must hold since dim(V) = dim(Re(V)) + dim(Im(V)).
The result follows from dim(Im(V)) = (p - 1)/2.
Best wishes,
Adam P. Goucher
-----Original message----- Sent: Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 13:30:31 From: "James Propp" <jamespropp@gmail.com> To: math-fun <math-fun@mailman.xmission.com> Subject: [math-fun] Reentrant polygons with area zero It's a nice approach, but I'm missing a step near the end. Why is it true that
When n is prime, the *only* integer linear relationships between
the imaginary parts of roots of unity are generated by relationships of the form:
Im[w^k] + Im[w^-k] = 0
?
Note that Adam is talking about the *nontrivial* roots of unity. After all, the relation Im[w^0] = 0 has an odd number of terms. But this doesn't mar Adam's argument because w^(a_0 - a_1), ... are all unequal to 1 (which is I suppose what Adam was getting at by saying "Note that none of these terms are zero").
Jim Propp _______________________________________________ math-fun mailing list math-fun@mailman.xmission.com https://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/math-fun
participants (1)
-
Adam P. Goucher