At 12:43 PM 2/11/2003, Edwin Clark wrote:
Do you still have the sequence up to n = 5 million? If so I would be interested in knowing whether or not the frequency of i such that u(i) = u(i-1) + 2 continues to hold up. Gaps between successive such i are quite small in my limited data (up to n = 2000).
Also u(i) = u(i-1) + 4 only occurs in my data for i = 18 and 28. And u(i) = u(i-1) + 13 only occurs once (at i = 53) in my list.
Here are the small gaps for the 370,468 Ulam numbers <= 5,000,000 gap freq percent 1 4 0.0% 2 136930 37.0% 3 50710 13.7% 4 2 0.0% 5 4057 1.1% 6 0 0.0% 7 806 0.2% 8 4524 1.2% 9 3 0.0% 10 373 0.1% 11 0 0.0% 12 18417 5.0% 13 1 0.0% 14 0 0.0% 15 12557 3.4% 16 0 0.0% 17 31669 8.5% 18 0 0.0% 19 750 0.2% 20 28652 7.7% 21 0 0.0% 22 14623 3.9% 23 0 0.0% 24 748 0.2% 25 20120 5.4% Gap of 1 occurs only once, 4 only twice, 13 only once, and 9 only 3 times. Gaps of 6, 11, 13, 14, 18, 21, 23 have not occurred.
Here's another idea to consider: Each Ulam number u(n), n >= 2 (zero index) is a unique sum a(n) + b(n) of distinct earlier Ulam numbers a(n) < b(n). Tabulate a(n) for 2 <= n <= 2000. There are only 47 distinct values of a(n). It seems like certain Ulams, starting with 2, 3, 47, 69, etc, are much more likely to be involved in the sums for subsequent Ulams.
participants (2)
-
David Wilson -
Jud McCranie