Re: [math-fun] Mrs. Perkin's Quilt variation
Usually when tiling a square is mentioned I think also of the corresponding question on a square torus. For the case of a square torus, it doesn't need to be integer-sided. E.g., the square torus of side sqrt5 can be tiled (edge-to-edge) by one 2 x 2 square and one 1 x 1 square. The sides of the tiles will *not* be parallel to the two perpendicular preferred directions on the torus (the sides of its underlying square). In general if J is an ideal* of the Gaussian integers Z[i], we can look at the square torus C / J , which has area = a^2 + b^2 and will contain a^2 + b^2 images of points in Z{i] by the quotient map. Question: --------- Will such a torus — WLOG, coming from the square with vertices at (0,0), (a,b), (-b,a), (a-b,a+b) — always be tilable by one square of side a and one square of side b ??? ----- —Dan ————— * J will just be a rotated and uniformly scaled copy of Z{i] itself, anything of the form (a + bi) Z[i] for integers a and b. ----- This variant, obtained by flipping the rectangle in the lower-right corner, may be aesthetically more pleasing: +-----+---+---+ |a a a|b b|c c| | | | | |a a a|b b|c c| | +---+---+ |a a a|d d|e e| +---+-+ | | |f f|g|d d|e e| | +-+-+-+---+ |f f|h|i|j j j| +---+-+-+ | |k k|l l|j j j| | | | | |k k|l l|j j j| +---+---+-----+ Tom Tom Karzes writes:
I think I have a 12-tile solution for 7x7:
+-----+---+---+ |a a a|b b|c c| | | | | |a a a|b b|c c| | +---+---+ |a a a|d d|e e| +---+-+ | | |f f|g|d d|e e| | +-+---+-+-+ |f f|h h h|i|j| +---+ +-+-+ |k k|h h h|l l| | | | | |k k|h h h|l l| +---+-----+---+
I don't know if this is optimal.
Tom
Allan Wechsler writes:
Suppose you are asked to tile an integer square of side n with smaller squares, but the tiles are all of side 1, 2, or 3. What is the smallest number of tiles, a(n), that you can get away with?
For n = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 the answers are fairly easily seen to be 1, 1, 1, 4, 8, 4; I'm not quite as sure that my value a(7) = 13 is correct.
If these values are right, then a(n) is not in OEIS.
It's obvious that a(3k) = k^2. I would expect that big squares can be optimally tiled by filling most of the space with 3's, with a "fringe" of some sort around two sides if n is not a multiple of 3. But I maintain a small hope that there will be "weird" solutions that don't look like this. Can anybody provide more values?
On 19/08/2017 21:20, Dan Asimov wrote:
Will such a torus — WLOG, coming from the square with vertices at
(0,0), (a,b), (-b,a), (a-b,a+b)
— always be tilable by one square of side a and one square of side b ???
... spoiler space ... ... spoiler space ... ... spoiler space ... ... spoiler space ... ... spoiler space ... ... spoiler space ... ... spoiler space ... ... spoiler space ... ... spoiler space ... ... spoiler space ... See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pythagorean_tiling. -- g
participants (2)
-
Dan Asimov -
Gareth McCaughan