[math-fun] J Edgar Hoover's Erdos number is lower than yours
FYI -- https://www.muckrock.com/news/archives/2015/jul/21/nothing-indicate-nothing-... "But, try as they might, the Federal Bureau of Investigation was never able to find much motivation behind his movements and acquaintances beyond the math of it all."
Hoover wasn't a coauthor! That would be like saying that a biographer of Erdös had an Erdös number of 1. (Mine's a 3. Below the median, but there are more than 30K of us, so not especially exciting.) On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Henry Baker <hbaker1@pipeline.com> wrote:
FYI --
https://www.muckrock.com/news/archives/2015/jul/21/nothing-indicate-nothing-...
"But, try as they might, the Federal Bureau of Investigation was never able to find much motivation behind his movements and acquaintances beyond the math of it all."
_______________________________________________ math-fun mailing list math-fun@mailman.xmission.com https://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/math-fun
-- Mike Stay - metaweta@gmail.com http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~mike http://reperiendi.wordpress.com
participants (3)
-
David Wilson -
Henry Baker -
Mike Stay