Re: [math-fun] Strip of squares in space puzzle (new & improved) (final version?)(finaler version)
I am incapable of stating my puzzle correctly, even though I know exactly what I mean. Why is it so difficult for everyone else? 4th try?: ----- Each square Q is adjacent to exactly 2 others, Q- and Q+, such that each pair ((Q-, Q) and (Q, Q+) is perpendicular and shares one of 2 adjacent edges of Q, and Q- and Q+ lie on opposite sides of the plane of Q. ----- —Dan
I did take a quick look at these square strips, and gained the impression that the set of paths potentially continuing from a given segment might be restricted to a roughly exponential horn-shaped region extending away from each endpoint: it would follow that no closed loops are possible. However I am presently unable to quantify this insight; nor have I yet found a neat computational model for enumerating such paths, that avoids incurring somewhat messy technical details. WFL On 3/18/18, Dan Asimov <dasimov@earthlink.net> wrote:
I am incapable of stating my puzzle correctly, even though I know exactly what I mean. Why is it so difficult for everyone else?
4th try?: ----- Each square Q is adjacent to exactly 2 others, Q- and Q+, such that each pair ((Q-, Q) and (Q, Q+) is perpendicular and shares one of 2 adjacent edges of Q, and Q- and Q+ lie on opposite sides of the plane of Q. -----
—Dan
_______________________________________________ math-fun mailing list math-fun@mailman.xmission.com https://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/math-fun
participants (2)
-
Dan Asimov -
Fred Lunnon