3 Aug
2007
3 Aug
'07
5:19 p.m.
On 8/3/07, Marc LeBrun <mlb@well.com> wrote:
Harrumph! should have read s(m, 1) = (-)^(m+1)*(m-1)! Just testing you. Everybody failed. WFL
Oh drat! I thought it might be s(m+1, 1) = (-)^m m! but was too shy to write in the margin.
Er, you're right, of course: s(0, 1) = 0. Duh! WFL