When I posted that remark about the sequence being absent from OEIS, a little voice kept nudging me to try searching also for a shorter segment; though I was busy elsewhere, and ignored it. Hans evidently followed the same path rather more assiduously. Coincidence? If not, what might have triggered our suspicions? WFL On 9/15/18, Neil Sloane <njasloane@gmail.com> wrote:
Hans, Thanks! "The sequence is given with some mistakes in the reference arXiv:math.NT/0309433". - I missed that. Yes, that would explain the discrepancies. I will mark the new version as "erroneous".
Best regards Neil
Neil J. A. Sloane, President, OEIS Foundation. 11 South Adelaide Avenue, Highland Park, NJ 08904, USA. Also Visiting Scientist, Math. Dept., Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ. Phone: 732 828 6098; home page: http://NeilSloane.com Email: njasloane@gmail.com
On Sat, Sep 15, 2018 at 2:25 PM, Hans Havermann <gladhobo@bell.net> wrote:
NS: "Are they really different, or is one an incorrect version of the other?"
The 2003 A088750 *mentions* the article on which your just-added A318936 is based. Specifically: "The sequence is given with some mistakes in the reference arXiv:math.NT/0309433".
_______________________________________________ math-fun mailing list math-fun@mailman.xmission.com https://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/math-fun
_______________________________________________ math-fun mailing list math-fun@mailman.xmission.com https://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/math-fun