Without disagreeing with anything that Eugene wrote, I'd like to point out that Mills' electrons are not even consistent with classical electrodynamics. Mills' theory is _advertised_ to appeal to those with a distrust of QM, (I have had first-hand interaction with these clowns on Wikipedia) but the funny part is that in order to believe in Mills' atomic "physics", you have to abandon all critical analysis under classical physics too. (The legerdemain begins in their model of the electron, with the claim that the electric field is perpendicular to a surface charge. A more rigorous phrasing would emphasize that the electric field is perpendicular to a surface charge _that is free to move under the influence of any non-perpendicular field_. Alas, they fix the charge distribution and still try to claim a perpendicular field. And no, the proposed charge distribution does not coincidentally yield a perpendicular field.) John Aspinall Eugene Salamin wrote:
... Here is an example of somebody that is doing just this in the energy business.
http://www.blacklightpower.com/index.shtml
... If you browse their web site, you will see that they present very impressive scientific credentials, at least impressive to someone who doesn't understand quantum mechanics.