I've liberated the WSJ article
 
http://www.qxmail.com/mathematics/robbins.htm
 
Thane Plambeck  "Stretching the Boundaries of Fair Use"
650 321 4884 office
650 323 4928 fax
http://www.qxmail.com/ehome.htm
----- Original Message -----
From: asimovd@aol.com
To: math-fun@mailman.xmission.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 4:16 PM
Subject: Re: [math-fun] Heron, Brahmagupta, Robbins, etc.

Henry writes:

<<
In yesterday's (Tue, Jul 29) Wall Street Journal (!), a front
page article talked about David P. Robbins's search for a generalization
of Heron's & Brahmagupta's formulae for the area of polygons inscribed
in circles, when given only their edge lengths.

The article indicated that Dr. Robbins was using only pencil & paper,
which I found a bit odd, considering that there are a number of symbolic
algebra systems that I would imagine would be quite useful for this
problem.
>>

I wasn't able to access the article, but given the above information I don't see what the puzzle is.  As long as a polygon inscribed in a circle is non-self-intersecting and contains the center of the circle in its interior, its area is the sum of the areas of all triangles T_E formed by each edge E and the center of the circle.

Assuming radius = 1, and that E = edgelength, the area A_E of T_E is given by
A_E = E * sqrt( 1 - (E/2)^2 ) / 2.

(If the center of the circle is not in the interior of the polygon and/or the polygon is self-intersecting, then the polygon's area is a signed sum of these triangles' areas.)

What am I missing?

--Dan


_______________________________________________
math-fun mailing list
math-fun@mailman.xmission.com
http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/math-fun