On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:51 AM, Andy Latto <andy.latto@pobox.com> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 4:01 AM, Dan Asimov <dasimov@earthlink.net> wrote:
Did anyone else see this article: < http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/25/science/25math.html > ?
I'm curious what people's reaction to it was.
The original article is not hard to find by googling, though in the interest of probity I shan't post a link.
Your googling skills are better than mine: I couldn't find the original article, and am interested in reading it. In what way would it compromise your probity to post a link? Is it a link to an illegal copyright-violating copy, or something?
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22The+Advantage+of+Abstract+Examples+in+Lear... I presume the 5th hit is the probably-copyright-violating full text link that Dan declined to post. --Michael
--Dan
_____________________________________________________________________ "It don't mean a thing if it ain't got that certain je ne sais quoi." --Peter Schickele
_______________________________________________ math-fun mailing list math-fun@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/math-fun
-- Andy.Latto@pobox.com
_______________________________________________ math-fun mailing list math-fun@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/math-fun
-- It is very dark and after 2000. If you continue you are likely to be eaten by a bleen.