I did this with a geometric construction, but even though the algebra was easy, I wouldn't have been able to predict the answer in the form that Dan obviously intends. And I agree with him; it sort of calls out for something that qualifies as an explanation, rather than a mere proof. On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Dan Asimov <dasimov@earthlink.net> wrote:
This is the window puzzle:
Given a window -- on the front of a building -- whose lowest point is height A and whose highest point is height B, how far from the building should a ground-level observer be so that the angle subtended by the window is maximum?
(Let's assume the window is the interval from (0,A) to (0,B) on the y-axis, and the observer is at (x,0) for x > 0.)
This is an easy enough calculus problem, and with a bit of thought can also be solved rigorously without calculus.
But the answer is a very simple function of A and B, and ideally there would be a solution that sheds light on why this should be.
So that's the real puzzle: Find an elegant solution that illuminates why the answer is in the simple form it is.
--Dan
________________________________________________________________________________________ "Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read." --Groucho Marx
_______________________________________________ math-fun mailing list math-fun@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/math-fun