18 Sep
2012
18 Sep
'12
9:15 p.m.
Yeah, I've now read the Chang article and it doesn't really contain any evidence even from expert opinion that Mochizuki has a proof. But it contains a notable absence of serious skepticism, plus significant belief that right or wrong, Mochizuki's paper(s) contain some major advances and insight. --Dan On 2012-09-18, at 6:19 PM, Charles Greathouse wrote:
Aha -- which may indicate that Chang called around and found many experts who do believe the proof.
Dan, I admire but do not share your faith.