Re: [math-fun] Is it me, or is math.stackexchange.com controlled by morons?

Years ago I posted here several trivariate series reversions for the semiaxes in the general case, and expressed surprise at the apparent absence of such a technique from the literature.

I asked Bill to no response . . . Thread name / date, anyone ? I also tried to grep "rwg" + catch-phrase or "gosper" + catch-phrase, to no avail. (I did find something funny about a rattleback though). Do I need to give the many reasons why this is not an efficient search strategy, and not likely to produce the desired results? Isn't it more polite when making this sort of assertion to give the referencing information so that the readers don't have to waste their own time searching through thousands of email files? --Brad