Aha -- which may indicate that Chang called around and found many experts who do believe the proof.
Dan, I admire but do not share your faith. Charles Greathouse Analyst/Programmer Case Western Reserve University On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 9:11 PM, Dan Asimov <dasimov@earthlink.net> wrote:
Aha -- which may indicate that Chang called around and found many experts who do believe the proof.
What does Terry Tao's blog say? That would probably have the latest buzz.
--Dan
On 2012-09-18, at 5:10 PM, Warren Smith wrote:
If this is true, then definitely Mochizuki deserves the Fields Medal, the works. I have no evidence it is true, though. His "inter-universal" work is far outside MY universe, I pretty much can't understand a word. And I doubt many number theorists can either. It doesn't look like number theory normally looks.
So I actually had sent a little tip to the NY Times science section saying "possible big story re ABC." Then I actually got a reply, basically saying "Nah, we at the NY Times will be highly interested in ABC, so thanks for the tip, *but* only when proof is confirmed, we don't report on maybe-proofs, we're not that kind of low-class paper." But, lo and behold, in today's science section there is a story on ABC by K.Chang.
_______________________________________________ math-fun mailing list math-fun@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/math-fun