6 Mar
2009
6 Mar
'09
6 p.m.
Scott Huddleston writes:
The muffin problem should really be considered in projective space r = m/p, and I'll henceforth usually write S(r) instead of S(m,p).
I don't understand; if we haven't proved that S(km,kp) = S(m,p) for all k, then how can this be right? Jim