That is likely to be true for all sufficiently large values of t. Jim Propp On Friday, June 20, 2014, Tom Karzes <karzes@sonic.net> wrote:
I always liked the contrapositive:
I am not, therefore I don't think.
Tom
Dan Asimov writes:
Mike -- I appreciate your belief in my existence. But there's a logical flaw in "I think, therefore I am":
Since the premise assumes the existence of an "I" -- using "I" as its subject -- the conclusion is already present in the premise, and so the conclusion adds nothing.
--Dan
On Jun 19, 2014, at 1:25 PM, Mike Stay <metaweta@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
Therefore you are!
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Dan Asimov <dasimov@earthlink.net <javascript:;>> wrote:
Thanks, I think.
_______________________________________________ math-fun mailing list math-fun@mailman.xmission.com <javascript:;> https://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/math-fun