Indeed, the point I had made at the GA site was that the Clifford / Grassmann algebra usage should be deprecated, partly on these grounds. But now I'm beginning to wonder if said ambiguity resulted only from my confusing "k-vector" with "k-tuple", etc? WFL On 3/14/10, Victor Miller <victorsmiller@gmail.com> wrote:
Good reference, but that points out an ambiguity. The wikipedia article in question uses k-vector for the wedge product of k vectors of any fixed dimension. Fred uses it for a vector in a vector space of dimension k. I think that both terms are in use.
Victor
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Mike Stay <metaweta@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 9:56 AM, <mcintosh@servidor.unam.mx> wrote:
Quoting Fred lunnon <fred.lunnon@gmail.com>:
Can anybody clarify the situation --- or better still, provide some relevant citations?
The phrase is commkon enough, but I don't have a reference handy.
-hvm
How about wikipedia? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multivector
------------------------------------------------- www.correo.unam.mx UNAMonos Comunicándonos
_______________________________________________ math-fun mailing list math-fun@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/math-fun
-- Mike Stay - metaweta@gmail.com http://math.ucr.edu/~mike http://reperiendi.wordpress.com
_______________________________________________ math-fun mailing list math-fun@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/math-fun
_______________________________________________ math-fun mailing list math-fun@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/math-fun