11 Nov
2016
11 Nov
'16
11:31 a.m.
Please take this discussion elsewhere. —Dan
On Nov 11, 2016, at 9:50 AM, Henry Baker <hbaker1@pipeline.com> wrote:
Apparently, one of the better polls -- the LATimes poll -- was heavily criticized for having one sample that appeared to be an outlier, but who affected the result quite significantly in a way that produced (in this particular case) a more *correct* prediction.