Indeed Tom — well spotted! But there must be an ultimate solution, with a lowest sum (which I’m not able to compute :-) This solution might not be unique, if some digits permutations are possible... Many thanks for your remarks! à+ É. Catapulté de mon aPhone
Le 24 juin 2020 à 00:02, Tom Karzes <karzes@sonic.net> a écrit :
You should be able to change 97 to 79. I think you can also change 17 to 15.
Tom
Éric Angelini writes:
Sorry for the wrong message — I confused two tries: this one looks(?) better: ...1 ...3 ...6 ..22 ..44 ..77 .555 .800 .999 ...2 ...5 ...9 ..33 .777 ..14 .808 .666 ...4 ...8 ..11 ..66 ..23 ..50 ..97 ...7 .111 ..88 ..49 ..56 ..32 .333 .222 ..40 ..17 ..89 ..55 .444 ..37 ..80 ..99 ..67 ..25 .888 ..90 ..60 à+ É. Catapulté de mon aPhone
_______________________________________________ math-fun mailing list math-fun@mailman.xmission.com https://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/math-fun