Hi, Ed.
<<
This has already been disproven via a counterexample. The paper is
from last year, and was disproven last year. Why the news services
are picking up on an old, known-wrong proof is a mystery.
>>
I remember hearing de Branges was working on a proof but not the
upshot.
In any case, could this "proof" respresent an attempt to fixw whatever
was wrong with the one last year?
Regards,
Dan