4 Jan
2007
4 Jan
'07
2:03 a.m.
Aaarghhh! Last message should have read as follows: On 1/4/07, Fred lunnon <fred.lunnon@gmail.com> wrote:
On 1/4/07, Michael Kleber <michael.kleber@gmail.com> wrote:
My intuition is that this, like the abiguous-planar case, would be better suited to a search targeted at finding those pairs to glue, rather than looking for an example with small edge lengths.
In 2 dimensions, a direct search for 5-vertex configurations became tedious at around edge-length 12; in contrast, gluing together pairs of (previously computed) 4-vertex cases was good for edge 32 --- and struck oil!
It could well be that an "intelligent" construction, similar to that of the planar ambiguous case, is the way to go in 3-D. So --- any ideas, anybody?
Fred Lunnon