22 Oct
2013
22 Oct
'13
11:07 a.m.
I don't agree. The arXiv is what it is -- basically an alternative to the role that sending out preprints by postal mail played some years ago: You are staking your claim to your results, at the risk of making a fool of yourself -- a long-honored tradition in scientific papers. It can and in fact will be improved when various commenting systems are put in place. --Dan On 2013-10-22, at 7:52 AM, Warren D Smith wrote:
In short: THE ARXIV SUCKS.