24 Mar
2020
24 Mar
'20
3:12 a.m.
"I'll point out that Eric sees a zero in front of the decimal mark as significant. Since of the two divisions one will always have this zero, the terms of his sequence can never have a zero digit. There's a different sequence that sees the zero in front of the decimal mark as insignificant: 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 4, 11, 40, 12, 400, 22, ..." I've persuaded Eric to invest in my version: https://oeis.org/A333480 The question of this sequence being infinite remains, awaiting perhaps an emerging pattern or roadblock as the sequence evolves.