26 Feb
2014
26 Feb
'14
8:22 a.m.
True, but as I mentioned, I was considering a worst case; some other cases are produced by various projections, which are indeed many-to-one. At 07:09 AM 2/26/2014, Marc LeBrun wrote:
="Henry Baker" <hbaker1@pipeline.com> we want h to be 1-1
Then h is an encryption, not a hash function that take a big set to small.
[sorry if this is redundant with rest of thread, which I can't read now]
--MLB