* rwg <rwg@sdf.org> [Dec 27. 2015 07:48]:
On 2015-12-26 11:03, Joerg Arndt wrote:
* rwg <rwg@sdf.org> [Dec 26. 2015 19:33]:
[...] Dawk, I forgot I had a picture! http://www.tweedledum.com/rwg/tril7.htm . [...]
Could you check against my numeration system? See http://jjj.de/tmp-xmas/arndt-curve-search-2015.12.26.pdf (new, better errors!) in section 3.3 pp.21ff, especially Figure 3.3-C.
Yes, I'm pretty sure my IMG_0245 is your R7.1 .
(btw. negating the base gives a tile that has a region around zero covered, and that I cannot identify with any curve I know). No picture?
OK: http://jjj.de/tmp-xmas/r7-numsys-tile.png (the one above) http://jjj.de/tmp-xmas/r7-neg-numsys-tile.png (negated base)
[...]
They actually form a trio, starting with http://www.tweedledum.com/rwg/7posies.bmp . They're topologically different--not morphs. Recursively join together clusters of seven to form a tree. Then "ensausage" it. In the limit, inside and outside are replaced by boundary, and all points are hit at least twice.
Ah! Gotta revisit those scripts peeling out boundaries (and generate L-systems for boundaries) .
[...]
I have quite a few prints where I pencilled (is that a word?)
In the UK. Stateside, it's penciled.
in similar things. But then the triangular grid is sort-of-ish a projection of the simple cubic lattice, looked upon from direction (say) (1, 1, 1).
Somebody thus treated the flowsnake.
Point of grammar: On p22 you say As the set contains a neighborhood of zero no signs are needed neither. Nobody says this because it sounds like a double negative. A chatbot might say it and blow Turing's test. --rwg
OK, thanks. I just dropped the word "neither". Still flagged as "to be reworded", will have to wait for the edit from my editor Edith. Best regards, jj
[...]