On 7/28/2013 7:12 AM, Warren D Smith wrote:
From: Gareth McCaughan <gareth.mccaughan@pobox.com> On 27/07/2013 11:18, Warren D Smith wrote: So for example, why do you not experience being in a superposition of living in Paris and Tokyo? Because [...] Why would you expect
a superposition of experiencing being in Paris and experiencing being in Tokyo
to resemble, in any way,
experiencing being in a superposition of Paris and Tokyo?
In default of some reason to expect that, I don't see why the question arises at all. And I know of no such reason, though I'm not a QM expert and maybe there is one that I've never encountered.
--this is an excellent point, and there's plenty of arguments of that vague ilk which may sound good..., but the problem is, these questions don't seem addressable by mathematics or precise reasoning. So when various philoso-physicists (at least those in the Everett camp) are going around saying "the foundational problems of QM are solved" it's all hogwash. It's basically religion, and hopes+dreams, not science. That debate probably would never end and it'd never be clear if it really solves the problem.
However, with my approach to the foundations of QM, the gordian knot is cut. It could really be science.
And not only that, I can kick their asses with more paradoxical issues. For example, why is the "position basis" favored over others?
It isn't in all cases. Atoms, for example, are usually found in energy eigenstates.
Decoherence tends to localize things. Give them precise positions. Why? With pure QM unitary symmetry, no basis favored over any other. Well, my view explains that. And if (say) in the early universe, everything were in a momentum eigenstate, with pure QM, no localization of anything would ever be possible, translation symmetry could never be broken.
It's because the interaction terms in the Lagrangian are position dependent. So even if everything were in a momentum eigenstate (and everything is in a superposition of energy-momentum eigenstates) there would be finite probabilities of localized interaction.
This (in flat spacetime) is a theorem of mathematics. So the physicists who somehow convince themselves that positions being the "pointer basis" is somehow caused by QM, thru mysterious measurement-simulating environmental effects, are full of crap. The true explanation is quantum gravity, I claim via my reasoning.
What about the "direction of time"? QM with measurement features a time direction. QM without features CPT symmetry.
The direction of physical time is determined by expansion of the universe (which allows entropy to increase) - which in a sense is a gravitational effect. Brent
Again, the hogwash camp somehow deduces this is not a paradox, using religious reasoning. My way, gordian knot cut.
_______________________________________________ math-fun mailing list math-fun@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/math-fun
----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2013.0.3349 / Virus Database: 3209/6526 - Release Date: 07/27/13