I.e., on the left edge of the box that hilbert spacefills. In[513]:= N[thetarnd[%%, 691], 69] Out[513]= {{{0.564468413605938579334729274272475662306258269970439046444505596028480 I} -> 0.564468413605938579334729274272475662306258269970439046444505596028480 I}} In[514]:= %511[[1, 1]] Out[514]= hilbert[-(1/2) + 1/2 EllipticTheta[3, 0, 1/4]] -> 1/2 I (-1 + EllipticTheta[3, 0, 1/2]) Even though these empirical relations have small coefficients, finding them seems to require improbably accurate numerics. Part of the problem is that 2n bits of t only determine n bits each of Re@hilbert@t and Im@hilbert@t, unlike an ordinary z[t] curve. —rwg On Sun, Aug 9, 2020 at 10:15 PM Bill Gosper <billgosper@gmail.com> wrote:
from three hilberts <http://gosper.org/3hilbthets.png> and three draguns <http://gosper.org/3dragthets.png> at theta constants. Such identities seem rather abundant, but probably not reliably enough to find a formula with a parameter. —rwg
There's a pretty good chance I can find a closed form for a terDragon[𝜗[]] or two. —rwg
I think these formulas can be proved with finite-state machines, but I'll just settle for a hundred digits.