If there is something coherent to say on the subject, I'd like to suggest (putting on my editor's hat) the Entertainments part of the Mathematical Intelligencer... --Michael On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 8:04 AM, David Wilson <davidwwilson@comcast.net>wrote:
Do all these muffin results justify a paper?
Are they being collected anywhere?
----- Original Message ----- From: "David P. Moulton" <moulton@idaccr.org> To: "math-fun" <math-fun@mailman.xmission.com> Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 1:38 PM Subject: Re: [math-fun] a general muffin problem upper bound
Earlier today I wrote
There's a general upper bound for the muffin problem that, while implicit in other people's posts, has not been explicitly stated, so I record it here.
...
I apologize for this claim--the corollary I gave is basically equivalent to the "fit constraint" upper bound Scott Huddleston gave in his post of January 20.
David P. Moulton
_______________________________________________ math-fun mailing list math-fun@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/math-fun
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.0.237 / Virus Database: 270.11.1/1962 - Release Date: 02/20/09 07:26:00
_______________________________________________ math-fun mailing list math-fun@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/math-fun
-- It is very dark and after 2000. If you continue you are likely to be eaten by a bleen.