31 Aug
2007
31 Aug
'07
8:07 p.m.
This argument (that going first is good) doesn't make sense. The second player won't adopt the same strategy as the first: the second player adopts the strategy of stopping when they get at least one point past the first player (or maybe stopping on a tie, if the first player was ambitious enough Knowing how many points the first player earned is a huge advantage. If the first player busts, you have an almost automatic win by just rolling once. --Joshua Zucker