OK, Neil. Will do. But I first want to improve my program and rerun it. --Edwin On Fri, Jan 1, 2021 at 8:37 AM Neil Sloane <njasloane@gmail.com> wrote:
25, 26, 28, 34, 35, 36, 38, 43, 46, 52, 53, 62, 63, 64, 82, 83, 236, 239, 246, 254, 296, 326, 329, 362, 392, 426, 462, 524, 542, 926, 962 By reduced I mean they don't contain 1's. As you pointed out one can insert as many 1's as desired in any of these and still have a looper. This sequence is not in the OEIS.
Ed, I hope you will submit it!
Best regards Neil
Neil J. A. Sloane, President, OEIS Foundation. 11 South Adelaide Avenue, Highland Park, NJ 08904, USA. Also Visiting Scientist, Math. Dept., Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ. Phone: 732 828 6098; home page: http://NeilSloane.com Email: njasloane@gmail.com
On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 12:41 AM Dan Asimov <asimov@msri.org> wrote:
Thanks, Allan.
But I would hope Eric could write his rules unambiguously so that we don't need to surmise what they are from examples.
—Dan
On Tuesday/29December/2020, at 9:01 PM, Allan Wechsler < acwacw@gmail.com> wrote:
I think one of Éric's examples made it clear that the procedure abducts the rightmost occurrence of the smallest digit and turns it into an exponent.
_______________________________________________ math-fun mailing list math-fun@mailman.xmission.com https://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/math-fun
_______________________________________________ math-fun mailing list math-fun@mailman.xmission.com https://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/math-fun