Re: [math-fun] squared squares and squared rectangles (Stuart Anderson)

I'm curious what the consensus, or plurality, if any, is on this: Over squared squares of all sizes, known or unknown, does the ratio of longest/smallest side have an inf > 0, or is the inf = 0 ? --Dan On 2013-06-08, at 8:42 AM, Stuart Anderson wrote:

I had a look at James William's simple perfect squared squares (SPSSs) collection (15 million) and found some new record holder in higher orders. In order 41 and above several record breaking 'pairs' showed up. There is a pair in order 43 with a side of 35172, and largest/smallest elements of 10558 and 1312; 10558/1312=8.05.