21 Apr
2003
21 Apr
'03
12:01 p.m.
At 08:55 PM 4/20/03 -0700, Thane Plambeck wrote:
These two paragraphs are from a 11/30/98 judgement by the California 2nd Appelate District Court in a case called "Jack M Janis et. al. vs the California State Lottery Commission"
[snip] However I never found a good write up of the arguments
before the California Supreme Court in the newspapers
Anyway, does anyone else remember this thing?
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/californiastatecases/b115300.pdf for anybody who wants to start researching. The appellate ruling is boring; the lower court ruling is affirmed largely on administrative grounds, and almost none of Janis's (alleged) reasoning makes it through to the court's logic. -A