23 Oct
2003
23 Oct
'03
9:29 a.m.
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, otto2hoh wrote:
As I said, the problem is more tricky; I didn't claim it was better. It occurred to me because it is what I assumed the answer to the original Conway problem was going to be. Actually I was a little disappointed when the original problem was easily solved with a seven line program.
Regards Otto otto@olympus.net
And I'm more than a little diappointed that anyone should even think of solving it any other way than mentally! John Conway