I apologize for not being clear. A $50,000 test of such an extraordinary claim is practically meaningless unless the results are blindingly obvious. On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Mike Stay <metaweta@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 8:11 AM, Jeff Caldwell <jeffrey.d.caldwell@gmail.com> wrote:
NASA's Eagleworks lab spent $50,000 to evaluate the supposed drive.
Sure; their job is to evaluate wild claims in the hope that one of them pans out.
This one claims to violate the principle of conservation of momentum; given the energy scales they're talking about, particle colliders would have seen such a violation almost immediately. There's absolutely no evidence for such a violation beyond their one very suspicious experiment. -- Mike Stay - metaweta@gmail.com http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~mike http://reperiendi.wordpress.com
_______________________________________________ math-fun mailing list math-fun@mailman.xmission.com https://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/math-fun