Thanks for the link! BTW, "239" deserves a much better entry in your list. Google "hakmem 239" for more info (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/239_%28number%29). So Wikipedia already has entries for particular integers. So we are free to edit & update these entries. At 10:26 AM 11/28/2007, Erich Friedman wrote:
This reminds me of the old proof that there are no uninteresting integers.
A Google search indicates that the number 184362536 (chosen more or less at random, after a half dozen failed attempts) does not occur anywhere on the Web.
What is the smallest positive integer with this property as of right now?
for those of you who aren't familiar with my page on the subject:
http://www.stetson.edu/~efriedma/numbers.html
according to that, 226 is the smallest uninteresting number.
in fact, more than half the e-mail i receive about that page tells me about the inherent contradiction in that statement.
erich