26 Oct
2013
26 Oct
'13
7:03 p.m.
Yeah, that's a very dumb rule. But they are perfectly happy with proofs accompanied by a reference. Also, I've gotten away (so far) with a number of proofs that nobody seems to mind. On 2013-10-26, at 5:42 PM, Whitfield Diffie wrote:
I have been told they are anti-proof and only want material that is supported by citations. Aside: I wonder if (some) citations have to be non-wikipedia; Perhaps you could sneak in a proof by embedding it in a pttern of articles.