In fact it appears that Jim’s example still works even if .9 is lowered to any number > (sqrt(5)-1)/2 ~ .618 . —Dan On Mar 21, 2014, at 10:20 AM, Dan Asimov <dasimov@earthlink.net> wrote:
I think I’ve verified what Jim says 32 ways from Sunday. I get
(81/200)*(3+sqrt(5))
or about 2.12 for the largest eigenvalue. This is certainly counterintuitive from my naïve viewpoint.
—Dan
On Mar 21, 2014, at 9:36 AM, James Propp <jamespropp@gmail.com> wrote:
I don't think this Dan'a guess is true. Consider the non-commuting matrices .9 .9 .0 .9 and .9 .0 .9 .9 Each of them has eigenvalues strictly inside the unit disk, but their product doesn't.
(Unless I made a mistake, in which case, please let me know!)
Jim
On Friday, March 21, 2014, Dan Asimov <dasimov@earthlink.net> wrote:
If the eigenvalues are *strictly* inside the unit circle, then I would expect the matrices to each be a contraction mapping on their vector space (with some contraction constant L < 1 equal to the maximum |eigenvalue|).
So then wouldn't a composite of finitely many of these matrices also be a contraction mapping, with contraction constant equal to the maximum of the finitely many contraction constants pertaining to each matrix in the composite?
_______________________________________________ math-fun mailing list math-fun@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/math-fun