I edited A178449 to add the one link that I found, some code (using bc) that computes the existing terms in a well-defined way, and the next term following the same pattern. I didn't mean to imply that Bill's terms were "incorrect" but he did express some doubt and perhaps the original "intended" series was defined differently. Feel free to suggest something better (like more concise code perhaps :-) or edit/comment on A178449. http://oeis.org/draft/A178449 - Robert On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 19:39, Robert Munafo <mrob27@gmail.com> wrote:
N. J. A. Sloane wrote [with typo correction -RPM]:
Concerning Bill Gosper's conjectured (but apparently incorrect beyond a certain point, according to a subsequent posting by Robert Munafo) series, I added it to the OEIS as A178449.
I also added the sequence of coefficients of 1/j_revert: A178451, where j_revert is A091406, the reversion of the j-function A000521.
Robert, could you add a further sequence, the correct version of Bill's, if you found it?
Thanks!
Neil
-- Robert Munafo -- mrob.com Follow me at: mrob27.wordpress.com - twitter.com/mrob_27 - youtube.com/user/mrob143 - rilybot.blogspot.com