="James Buddenhagen" <jbuddenh@gmail.com> I think the square-free terms, namely: 17, 82, 97, 113, 193, 257, 274, 337, 433, 514, 577, 593, 626, 641, 673, 706, 881, 914, ... make a more interesting sequence, and it is already in OEIS as A184982.
I haven't been following this thread closely but this comment seems worth yet another reminder: Not submitting a sequence because it seems "less interesting" isn't really in the best interests of the OEIS and its users. The bar should be set just high enough to filter out truly silly sequences. But borderline cases should be given the benefit of the doubt and submitted. We simply have no way of knowing today what sequences will turn up as valuable serendipitous hits in future searches, particularly from queries generated by superseeker and other automation over the next few centuries. Each sequence that's included in the OEIS increases the chances for it contributing to mathematical knowledge in this way. The potential benefit of that is much greater than the small overhead of carrying another entry. Heh. There's still plenty of A-numbers available, so go for it!