Why have I never seen a math-challenged individual write a useful computer program? Somewhere between a misconception of an what you want the machine to do and the machine doing something that makes you happy, there is a heap of mathematics, and telling would-be computer scientists otherwise is at best wishful thinking and at worst dangerous misguidance. The "process expression" paradigm is nothing new has been around in various guises since the dawn of computing. The business world has always slavered at the idea of removing the geek from the software development process. Business visionaries would all love to be able to reach into their process toolbox and pick out their desires, and have the computer automagically glue them together into a functional business system. or consumer product. Unfortunately, these desires are almost invariably vague and conflicting, and there is a vast gap between these desires and the hardware, a gap that heretofore has never been successfully breached by anyone except the technically proficient. Previous attempts at computer intelligence have fallen far short of their promise, and I see little to inspire hope on that front. For better or worse, geeks and algorithms will continue to stand between visionaries and their dreams for the foreseeable future. Yes, there are lots of things that are not algorithms, but algorithms are the presently necessary factor that makes these things useful.